Here we are again

 I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

                                         – Article 2, Section 1, Clause 8 of The Constitution

By reciting the oath of office to begin his second nonconsecutive term as president of the United States, adjudicated rapist Donald Trump told the first lie of his new administration. He has no interest in preserving, protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States. We saw that in his first term.

This moment also gives us cause to wonder exactly what is the best of Trump's ability in the first place? Remember the American carnage he described in his first inaugural? Turns out, he unarguably was the singular author of all the carnage that followed.

Within hours of uttering his inaugural lie on Monday, he announced that he is going to ignore the 14th Amendment with a presidential executive order that guarantees birthright citizenship. He can't do that, of course. You can't legally change amendments with an arbitrary stroke of the Sharpie. Unless, of course, you think you're higher and mightier than the Constitution you just swore to preserve and defend. (To me, the word "preserve" implies that you can not attempt to change any aspect of the Constitution with an executive order).

That evening – the very evening of his inauguration – he pardoned more than 1,500 insurrectionists who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2020. He said he would, and he did. All of them.

This action was so foul that the country's largest police union, the Fraternal Order of Police, as well as the International Association of Chiefs of Police, both of whom endorsed Trump, have spoken out against the pardons. Wow.

Those pardons on Inauguration night gave us the revolting spectacle of a convicted presidential felon pardoning convicted felons. By doing so, he put back on the streets not only insurrectionists, but also any number of cop beaters, abusers of women and at least one pedophile.

Consequently, Trump has put back on the street a virtual regiment of Oath Keepers, Proud Boys and Three Percenters – many of whom were armed and injured upwards of 140 police officers on J6 – and therefore regained the use of his personal pseudo-militia. Upon their release, several rioters already have pledged to follow Trump's leadership with promises of violence, chaos and disorder.

What ever happened to Back the Blue? It's more like back the coup.

Hmm. A paramilitary group standing by and standing back (for now) for their leader. If you have any sense of history, Trump's unofficial militia is very reminiscent of Hitler's SA Brownshirts of the 1930s. Look it up and draw your own conclusions because I'm not doing all your work for you. You should have done that before the elections.

Releasing these felons stands in marked contrast to Trump's treatment of immigrants who are seeking asylum. Trump claims the country is being invaded by murderers and rapists (ironic, that) and declared a state of emergency. He has relocated active-duty military to the southern border to try and halt "the invasion." And yet, he releases violent insurrectionists into our society. What an ignorant, dangerously hypocritical fool.

•   •   •

Trump's administration of retribution for his perceived grievances (which is closely following the Republican wet dream described in the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025) includes an assault of any and all diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs in the Federal government.

Or, in other words, it's about the elimination or reversal of any civil rights legislation in the past 60 years or so. Colleges may now admit only whites. Employers may now hire only whites. Our bias is showing.

I would have bet the house that DEI was based on a straight line to the tenets of Christianity as described in the Bible. You know, especially the part that describes God's plan for humanity where all people should be treated with respect and inclusivity, regardless of background or circumstances.

Apparently, not in Trump's world. I am waiting for the Evangelicals to justify for me what is happening here. I'm having trouble seeing God's plan in this.

•   •   •

I didn't think it would happen so soon, but the roundup of people slated for deportation (see "Brownhsirts") has already begun.

So far, several workplaces across the country have been targeted by ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) officers, apparently entering buildings without warrants. How is that possible? Among those taken in a roundup in New Jersey were a military veteran who served his country as well as several Puerto Ricans, who happen to be American citizens by birth. All this suggests the arrests are random. And, don't you know, based on racial profiling.

It's also been reported that many field hands are no longer reporting for work. Consequently, some crops are beginning to rot in the fields. If that happens on a larger scale in the ensuing weeks, expect the price of produce to skyrocket. And if that happens, can a recession be far behind?

•   •   •

Early Saturday morning, Trump fired a dozen of inspectors general without notice (which is illegal. By law, they must be given 30 days notice of termination).

IG's are critical to maintaining oversight in government. If they are doing their job correctly, they unveil potential or actual corruption in government agencies and make sure those agencies are following the law.

But Trump's purge will affect veterans affairs, health and human services, housing and urban development, labor, the environment and – get ready – social security. What could possibly go wrong?

•   •   •

It's already been a consequential week in Trump's rampage to reshape the government and the way we live our lives. 

Well, good luck with that. Trump has ordered health agencies to stop warning Americans about bird flu and to halt the publication of scientific reports. He's also put a pause on the National Institute of Health's cancer research for review.

You know those egg prices you thought were too high under Biden?

Guess what's coming?

Jimmy Carter

The first thing that pops into my brain when I think of President Jimmy Carter is inflation (bear with me, my memories of Carter improve significantly. I promise).

 Kim and I had just gotten married in 1980 and within a year, we were looking to buy our first house. The trouble was, inflation was running at 14 percent at the time. I think most mortgage interest rates were hovering around 18 percent, if memory serves (this was, after all, 44 years ago).

We finally heard of a program offered by a local financial institution where first-time home buyers could purchase a house for 16 percent interest over 30 years. We jumped on it. Over time, we were able to refinance a couple of times to lower the interest rate, and eventually we paid off the mortgage ahead of schedule.

At the time, I thought the Carter presidency was unremarkable. It was also in 1980 that saw the failed hostage rescue attempt ("Operation Eagle Claw") that left eight American servicemen dead in the Iranian desert.

It seemed America could do nothing right. High inflation, coupled with the failed rescue attempt, hustled Ronald Reagan into office later that year, seemingly booting Carter to historical oblivion as a one-term president.

But when Carter died last month at the age of 100 and the retrospectives began poring in, my ever changing perspective of Carter's presidency changed even more.

Carter actually inherited the high inflation rate when he took office in 1977. In an effort to curtail inflation, Carter appointed Paul Volcker as chair of the Federal Reserve. Volcker raised interest rates, eventually knocking down inflation just in time for Reagan's first term.

Most of us might regard the Camp David Accords as Carter's crowning achievement, bringing a peace between Egypt and Israel that still exists. Carter also continued to normalize relations with China after Nixon first opened doors.

It was during the Carter administration that negotiations brought about the release of the hostages in Iran on the day that Reagan was inaugurated.

Carter, a principled man of faith, was also a social visionary who long pushed for civil and human rights.

He was also a dedicated environmentalist, placing 56 million acres of land in Alaska under federal protection and soon signed into law the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, which included protections for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Carter also tried to clean up government with ethics reforms in the wake of Nixon's Watergate adventure by putting independent inspectors in every department. He attempted to make government more representative of the country itself by appointing more Blacks, Jews and women to political positions than all previous presidents combined.

He also created the Department of Education, the Department of Energy and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

Carter's post presidency and his work with Habitat for Humanity showed us the innate decency of the man, as if we could ever forget. He did, after all, win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 for "decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflict, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development.

We are about to embark on an era that will inaugurate a convicted felon (who is also an adjudicated rapist) to the presidency and whose first inclination is to pardon hundreds of insurrectionists who violently tried to change the will of the American people with a damned lie. 

This fact alone makes the Carter years seem like it happened in a different country.

 

 

 

A Complete Unknown

 

The first time I became aware of Bob Dylan was probably around 1966. I was working a summer job as the municipal swimming pool's custodian. Yeah, I was the guy who was responsible for turning on the chlorine tank every morning and tossing in shovel loads of alum to make sure the daily pH levels of the water met public safety standards with the litmus paper tests I took.

Yep, your summer health depended on the responsible nature of a 16-year-old nonscientist high school sophomore throwing chemicals into your germ-infested community pool.

I was also the guy who cleaned out the locker rooms with Pine Sol and every evening picked up the trash you left behind on the grounds with a spear stick and a baggie.

But I had the place to myself. It was the best job I ever had.

Anyway, I'd amuse myself by turning on the PA system and listen to either records (we had a pool turntable) or the radio while I was working. And my music tastes were changing. I was slowly graduating from The Lettermen and the Tijuana Brass to The Beatles and Rolling Stones.

That's probably when I first heard "Blowin' in the Wind." Only it wasn't Dylan singing. It was Peter, Paul and Mary, who often served as a more commercial vehicle to Dylan's gravel-voiced delivery. And it was the lyrics that hit me like an arrow to the heart. In 1966, we were moving deeper and deeper into the anti-Vietnam War era and I was approaching draft age. The Civil Rights movement was also taking foot, so for me, Dylan's transformative lyrics – the ether of his words – truly meant something.

I bring this up in the wake of the current Dylan movie biopic, "A Complete Unknown," which traces the early years of Dylan's influential life.

You have to be careful with movie biopics: they edit, delete, change and/or invent stuff to move the narrative. You need to know that going in because movies only have two hours or so to tell a story. Having said that, there's been some really entertaining biopics out there. My short list includes "The Glenn Miller Story," "The Buddy Holly Story," "Coal Miner's Daughter," "Walk The Line," (directed by James Mangold, who also directed the current Dylan flick), "Elvis" and "Bohemian Rhapsody."

You can add "A Complete Unknown" to that list.

The cast is astounding. Timothée Chalamet portrays Dylan so well, you can't even understand all his mumbles. (which might be a technical issue with the production. Or not). Monica Barbaro is brilliant as Joan Baez, and Boyd Holbrook nails it as Johnny Cash. But perhaps the best supporting nod, I think, goes to Edward Norton as Pete Seeger as he tries to mentor the youthful and rebellious Dylan through the bohemian hills and dales of the early 1960's folk music culture. I didn't know Seeger was that influential.

I was further taken in when I learned that all the primary actors did their own singing and played their own instruments. That, to me, is worth the price of admission alone. Some critics have suggested that Chalamet does Dylan better than Dylan. And Chalamet's duets with Barbaro were remarkable. All done live. No dubbing.

It's hard to determine what the plot of the movie is. Again, some critics have asked why this movie even exists at all (kind of harsh there, I think). There is some triangular conflict when Dylan's girlfriend, Sylvie Russo (a pseudonym for the real life Suze Rotolo, who shared the "Freewheelin' with Bob Dylan" album cover with Dylan) and Baez that comes and goes with some feelings getting hurt, so bad on you, Bob.

But through it all, the movie seems to be taking us to the place where Dylan (Is he folk? Is he rock? Is he blues? Is he country? What exactly is he?) abandons his acoustic guitar and goes electric. This iconic moment apparently happened at the chaotic 1965 Newport Folk Festival, and drew the ire of fans and festival organizers alike, including Seeger). Shouts of "traitor!" littered the stage, as well as some actual litter thrown at him during his performance.

There is some question about that. YouTube video clips don't make it seem all that bad. There is some booing, but to my ear, not much. And were they booing because of a poor sound system, or were they booing the short three-song set he played? It's your call. A year later, in Manchester, England (and not shown in the movie), someone shouted "Judas!" and Dylan replied with "You're a liar!" and asked his backup band to play even louder.

I came out of the theater simply amazed and with a warmly renewed awe for Dylan, who received the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2016 "for having created new poetic expressions within the great American song tradition."

Before 1961, nobody, absolutely nobody, heard lyrics like Dylan's in music before.

It kind of made me wonder to whom does Dylan, now 83, pass the folk tradition torch? Woody Guthrie handed off to Pete Seeger, who handed off to Bob Dylan, who handed off to ... Bruce Springsteen? Jason Isbell? Taylor Swift? Pfft.

Who raises our consciousness now, especially when we need it most? 

The times they are a-changin'... still.